- A challenge to the traditional/historical notion of "Photograph as Documentary" in nature + examination of history of documentation.
- Use of photography as a critique of mass media (we are a product of such images; such images do not reflect who we are).
- Photography as poised to counter the traditional notion of the "male gaze" (for whom works of art are made).
- Photography confounding the truth: Constructed images + fictionalized histories (documents v. pictures).
By the 1970s, the era of social reform, documentary is being considered as remnant, an act of refusal; is seeing really believing?
Martha Rosler - Red Stripe Kitchen:
OTHER PHOTOGRAPHERS: Allan Sekula, Aerospace Folktales - creates a series of folktales as yet another way to approach the public documentary.
Victor Burgins: "Life Demands a Little Give and Take"
Artists are turning the nature of traditional documentary on its side. How objective is documentary?
Documentary photography is interesting because people normally expect a the contents of a photo to be true, as opposed to an interpretation of reality (such as like in a painting) -- but it isn't always entirely fully true.
How do we know if something is true or not in a documentary?
One person's idea of documentary photography is to bring awareness to an issue.
CARRIE MAE WEEMS
From Here I Saw what Happened and I cried: - Reinterpretation of a historical document.
Carrie Mae Weems - Kitchen Table Series.
No comments:
Post a Comment